Archive for the 'SEO' Category

Google finally pushes the PR Export!

After so many months of speculations on Google PR updates and the doubts that Google will discontinue the PR export in order to fight link sales, today we’ve finally saw the change in the green bar on all websites. Thank you G.

Today’s Google PR Export or Update (its not actually update because Google updates it dynamically every day but only exports the results in few month or sometimes a bit more) was as always one really interesting event. The one of the things that we can quickly realize is that all web directories are will lower page rank than before, but unique content websites are with a bit low amount of links scored higher pagerank than others. This most probably means that the duplicate content algo is somehow modified to capture much more spam than ever before (which is something rather expected)

Also another really interesting and also expected outcome was that due to the progressive expanding of the web, all page rank values require more and more links to be achieved. Now for pr 3 you need more than 2.5k link popularity, pr 4 more than 5 to 20k links and pr 6 > 150k. Note that this is LINK POPULARITY not links only which is relatively the number of actual links since most search engines don’t show the real value.

I’ll update this post as soon as I get more info on the topic as see what my buddies are saying about it.

Related Posts:
Blogger Beta Finally Coming Out Of Beta!
Firefox Add-ons Page Getting an Update…Finally
What To Expect From Wordpress Version 2.1
Microsoft buys Yahoo?
Google Groups Finally Out Of Beta, Warez Trouble Ahead?

Google vs SEOs part 2

Once again I’m starting with this so boring but really frustrating topic on Google vs Link Buying, but I don’t think I have any other choice since that mess got totally out of hand.

Two days ago G’s manual link selling/buying “zealots” made the second massive wave of PR DownGrades see here for a good list in which most pr5 to 9 websites received pr3 to 5 as punishment. This big hit to the webmaster community felt really painful to everyone especially after the fact that in the first wave most big web directories including the DMOZ got their DownGrade for link sales and that really confused all of us since those directories seemed to be “reliable” and strong with good quality measurements for paid review/inclusion.

Anyway, things are getting messy not only from G but also with Yahoo as they recently upgraded their link spam algo to fight wordpress sponsors and this resulted into massive backlink decrease (some websites lost about 66% of their backlinks). Fortunately we didn’t have any website that had sponsored themes and we didn’t find any changes in both traffic or backlinks as many others did.

What is the new link strategy ?

That’s the SEO question of the day (maybe for Q4 of 2007) as most popular search engine manipulation strategies are out of date. Unfortunately I’ll have to underline that this “war” will only result in massive amount of “gray hat websites” that will abuse some little holes in the SE algorithms to gain good ranking. Actually those punishments on the large players are in a way benefit for smaller websites that never had the chance to hit the top, and now those sites are going to rank like never before and gain tons of good quality traffic so keep working on your content and hit the wave while you can!

Related Posts:
If You Don’t Leave SEO Now, You’ll Hate Yourself Later
What Everybody Ought to Know About Sitewide Links
Five Little Known Ways To SEO For Valentine’s Day Traffic
Google Adwords Audio Ads
Overture Keyword Suggestion Tool Out Of Business

The Best link-bait ever!

Technorati Profile
Hello everyone, I’m sorry that nowadays I don’t write that often but I’m kind’a busy lately with my work and I don’t have the proper time to write articles and research what’s happening around, so this time I’ll post one very interesting SEO tactic for quick accumulation of high quality backlinks.

Affiliate Marketing as SEO?

Yep, everybody knows that affiliate marketing is extremely useful in terms of sales, but even better for SEO. The whole thing is that people are so greedy about money that they will post your affiliate link on every page and even if they don’t get any sales the link will still be there. Now the trick is to craft your Affiliate marketing scripts very carefully so that you will be able to control what’s being listed on that url and therefore benefit the most from it.

I’ve always love Amazon dot com for their innovative strategy (that’s back in the 90s) when they opened their first affiliate program. They were very smart and created keyword rich text links with images loading from their own website for affiliate program that created numerous deep backlinks. This increased their rankings and nowadays they rule the books niche (actually few others also), and this is mainly due to this extremely smart affiliate link bait strategy.

I remember that few years ago I was so greedy that I put amazon affiliate ads on few of my websites. This multi-linking per page is really awesome deal for the linked website! so much link juice … I guess that explains why Amazon dot com now has 184 million backlink popularity! Also the big thing about REL - Nofollow is not really common practice and the redirects are a big headache so only very small percentage will bother doing it.

One of the interesting things that I found with Google was that they do accept affiliate links and they count fairly large percentage of them. The main reason is because they are highly relevant to the linked page, they are located in top visible areas and that makes them pass very nice PR juice, and people do click on them!

What I’m suggesting? If you have a website that offers some services, start affiliate programs! Even if you don’t make much profit due to revenue share, its still good because you’ll get on top of the organic listings fairly quickly. Simple as that!

Also be aware of what type of linking structure you do because that’s extremely important. The best way to make affiliate network is to use browser referred url as the affiliate id and use the clean html url as the link. This will bring you the maximum benefit! If you think that you “affiliates” won’t agree to that then you can use the /file.html?affiliateid=123 style but never more than 1 parameter!!

If you need help in building your affiliate program just send us an email and we’ll work out something for you.

Related Posts:
The Secret of Current Event Search Engine Traffic Bait: An Example In Three Easy Steps
Google Now Shows Link Anchor Text Phrases
Cloak Your Affiliate Links Tutorial -NEW!
Top Five Things To SEO Your Blog For Christmas
Sitemap Link Rel In Header

Aviva Directory offers 15 days promo coupon $20 off regular listings

I just received the Aviva Directory newsletter where they are offering special promotion $20 dollars off from July 15 to July 31 if you use special coupon code “Umdum“. This makes regular listings to be $29.95 with the coupon which is a really nice deal!

For the people that don’t know much about Aviva Directory, I’d like to say that this is one of the best directories on the Internet, based on quality and page rank. Based on simple SEO estimations, a listing in Aviva Directory can bring you so much pr and link juice than about 200 regular directories and counting. The is mainly due to the large number of backlinks those guys invested in and the strong pagerank on numerous inner pages that can be easily passed on your listings.

I don’t want to advertise them too much, but I’m really happy with them and I can most definitely say that they are one of the 10 directories I have paid listings. Also here I can put some criticism on the Yahoo directory which is the most pricey directory I’ve ever enlisted in with its $250 annual listings and the fact that I didn’t get even one hit from that directory for the 6 months I have listing with them. I guess the large number of links and my deep page listing is making it the most unprofitable investment I ever had and they only thing I can say in my defence why I have a listing there is only prestige. (but in reality who cares about prestige when its all about visitors and link juice).

Also I’d like to say that Aviva is one of the few directories that I know that receives huge amounts of actual visitors. This makes aviva very interesting and cost effective way to get both good pr and few visitors for the price of $30.

I just wanted to share this and help you enjoy this great benefit since I’m on my way to list my huge array of niche websites.

To get your listings click on the banner on the right or click here

Cheers,

Venetsian.

Related Posts:
Cloak Your Affiliate Links Tutorial -NEW!
The New Directory Era
Web Directories
DMOZ Dead?
Manual Directory Submission Services

Search Engine Penalization is Real

I just stumbled on one very interesting article in the Forbes Magazine titled The Saboteurs Of Search which I find quite interesting because it somehow answers some serious SEO questions about spam and possible penalization for your or competitor website.

Matt Cutts, a senior software engineer for Google, says that piling links onto a competitor’s site to reduce its search rank isn’t impossible, but it’s extremely difficult. “We try to be mindful of when a technique can be abused and make our algorithm robust against it,” he says. “I won’t go out on a limb and say it’s impossible. But Google bowling is much more inviting as an idea than it is in practice.”

Cutts also points out that any potential for sabotage exists across all search engines. “It really should be called ’search engine bowling,’ ” he says.

I’m not sure what this will lead, but most definitely will make some people try cyber terrorism and buy some bad neighbourhood links for their competition and see what happens. I already stumbled across few threads on DP where people were looking for adult related links and similar to point to their competitors.

Now Matt doesn’t really say what will be the punishment and how harsh it will be especially after the fact that they know this technique can be used on competitors and is a way of cyber terrorism, but we can most definitely observe and listen to what’s happening around us and if there is a way to penalize I bet that eventually we will hear someone screaming that lost ranking for no particular reason or got his competitor out.

In reality black hat seo offers few very interesting techniques that can be easily done to manipulate and punish small to medium sized websites. The easiest way is the direct duplicate content penalty where the website that has highest pagerank is assumed to be the origin of the content and basically if you have higher pr website you can just copy the content of your targeted website or at least the main pages that are their landing pages, and sit back and watch their rankings drop. The problem with that trick is that you will be clearly identified as the attacker, but if you got your tracks covered with privacy and pay pal payments there is no problem. (I’m not giving you ideas).

Search Engine Link Spam is clearly the second case, and everyone know that if they participate in link farming projects they can get penalized.

I’ll bring updates as they come.

Related Posts:
What To Expect From Wordpress Version 2.1
Stoney deGeyter of SEG Takes a Shot at Randy of SEOmoz!
Google’s New Patent ‘Similarity Engine’
Google finally pushes the PR Export!
Online Success – Plentyoffish.com

Statistics on Search Engines and their users

I suppose that’s not a headline story, but I stumbled across some very interesting research data and I thought that it would be really nice to share it with you and confirm with statistics the fact that internet users are getting smarter and smarter and they are heavily exploiting search engine functions to better navigate their way in finding their desired information. Also as we’ve expected the growth in popularity is quite impressive and you must check it out.

Since the dot com boom (1994-1996) the internet is growing quite rapidly both in content (the number of websites) and in the same time in the number of it’s users, somehow becoming a way of life. I’m not going to exaggerate but yes we live in the Internet Era where massive amounts of information can be easily accessed and only with a single click you can find what you are looking for. This incredible network of information enables people to easily access virtually unlimited collection of shared user data on large variety of topics (in exception are only few countries like china that don’t have human rights and similar, but that’s only when politics collides with our freedom of information flow) and this improves our level of knowledge in particular interests quite drastically due to our new ability to find numerous documents without even leaving our home. In the recent past, libraries, newspapers and magazines were the only places where people can find information on events and discoveries but now things are so different and so easy for all of us. This ability to gather more and more information virtually effortless in such a short period of time enables humans to maximize their learning abilities and to obtain more and more knowledge n their particular field of interest.

North America has the largest percentage of internet users in the whole world mainly due to the fact that Internet for first time was developed in the US in early 1962 as a Government/Military Project for linking computers around the states in case of War, but quickly reshaped as very useful way to transfer information between two points. The first developers of the ARPNET project (the first name of the internet) were MIT and NPL, and they are considered to be the inventors of the internet. Actually our common understanding of the internet came far later in 1980 when students began exploiting the possibility to “host” public chat rooms and share information between each other by opening file servers. This quickly became popular and in early 1990’s the first public websites were born.

People quickly discovered the potential of the web and started sharing more and more information thus making the internet grow exponentially. Nowadays the internet demands are so high that about 69% of all North Americans use the internet at least once a month.

A Canadian media and search engine advertising company called SKOOIZ just released some fresh research data on the internet usage and behavior of French Canadians. In March 2007 they made a survey on 1272 Canadians and shared their research results with us.

What kind of search engines people are using?

Be prepared to be amazed! And the winner for French Canadian Search Engine is…. Google with 80%, followed by Yahoo 3.6% and MSN with 2.5%. That’s mainly due to the fact that there are not that many Multilanguage search engines. The US market on the other hand is a bit more diverse as it has few more search engines but still Google has about 44%, Yahoo with 28.7% and MSN with 12.5% of the total search queries which is still not bad.

How Many Keywords people use to form their Search Query?

I guess Canadians like all other people are somehow aware of the massive amount of information stored/index by search engines and know that the best way to find what they are looking for is to use more than one keyword for effectiveness. The French Canadians for example are quite intelligent searchers and only 10% of them have the time to look in the broad search results of single keyword queries. Fortunately the rest of the interviewed people were quite skillful as 50% used two keywords, 30% used three keywords and 10% four or more keywords.

This clearly shows that people are going for the long tail keywords and optimizing only for one and two words is merely not enough. Also optimizing for the low end long tail keywords is still quite easier and you can rank on top with merely no efforts at all. Few years back most people were going for few words because there was no competition, but now within those huge amounts of data it’s quite better to go for the long tail and hit your share of the 40% in the beginning and later on as you grow then target the high end keywords.

The new internet users use advanced search engine queries

The interesting thing that got my attention is the large number of people that use advanced search queries. About 50% of all French Canadian internet users use the advanced search operators for to optimize their queries from which 10% do that on regular basis. That explains the fair number of search engine queries our SEO Website CMS logged that containing logical operators in them, so its not only French Canadians that use that functionality. I guess this new trend spreads traffic even further and now even small websites have the chance to get visited if they contain that particular set of positive and negative keywords, but that’s really very rare cases.

How many result pages internet users view?

Everybody knows that the top 3 results get 60% of all the traffic and each lower ranking decreases your possible hits enormously. Thus being on the second page (lower than 10 positions) is almost like you don’t exist. French Canadians are no different. If not able to find what they are looking for, about 15% don’t even bother to go to the second page and immediately run a new query. Then about 40% of the people that bothered to view the second page simply give up and run new query. We can note that the funnel shaped traffic is mostly for the top 5 listings and the rest gets only a few clicks. In this sense, I’ve received so many responses from my clients that when they got to the top 3 their world turned around and from a keyword that they rarely got traffic is now their biggest hit. This happens in highly relevant keywords where people find what they are looking for on the top 3-5 results and don’t even bother to go beyond that. In such situations if you are you’re ranked on position N:7-8 even highly searched keywords and you might not get more than few clicks because visitors are happy with what they found on the listings above yours.

How many people click on Sponsored Search Engine Ads?

I’ve been trying to explain that thing to most of my clients, but it’s really hard for them to understand the benefits of organic search engine listings compared to pay-per whatever advertising. The Canadian research data clearly shows that only about 2%-5% of all users click often on advertisements and about 25% state that they “sometimes” click them. On the other hand 25% say that they never click on ads and about 50% very rarely clicks on ads. This statistics explain why a lot of advertisers get thousands ad impressions with few to no clicks at all for even great looking, highly relevant advertisement.

Organic Search Engine listings are the best advertising way as it get about 80-90% of all traffic (even more than that) and if you’re ranking good you will receive so much free traffic for the small fee of few hundred dollars in Website Search Engine Optimization expenses. It would be dumb to spend so much money on Pay-Per-Click when for quite less than that you can get free organic listings.

What Age Groups are general internet visitors?

The internet users are generally young people. The largest portion of the French Canadian internet users form 25% of all users and are between 25-34 years old, followed by 19% for 45-54. The rest is about 15% youngsters 18-24, 10% teenagers, 12% for 55 and older and on last place 9.7% people of age 35-44. This shows that large portion of website visitors are from 25 to 54 years old. This can be correlated to the income and education data shown below.

How much internet users earn?

The statistics show that the largest portion of internet users (about 30%) earn in the ranges between 30k-50k per year. Then about 15% earn about 50k-70k and again 15% above 70k. This most definitely means that internet users have some good money to spend online (proven by the greatly increasing online sales statistics with each year), so it won’t be a bad idea to start your own internet store (if you don’t already have one).

How often do you use the internet?

If it was me, I was going to say all the time, but in this case 87% of the interviewed French Canadians use it every day. This huge percentage in combination with some simple predictions on the past and current internet use can predict that with each passing year the number internet users is going to almost double and therefore user traffic is going to increase dramatically. We are talking about some really huge numbers that will be quite normal in few years, so start building up websites, optimize, build links and hit the wave as hard as you can.

For more information on their findings please see their report here and you can also discuss that in their official blog here. If you are interested in getting affordable search engine optimization services for you website contact me via the contact form or call 646-536-9268

Related Posts:
Google is Going Down and MSN/LIVE dominates?
Google buys FeedBurner for 100 Million US Dollars!
Kontera Publisher Statistics are still down
In search for the Perfect Organic Link
Monday Morning SEO News Roundup Mar 19

In search for the Perfect Organic Link

Nowadays all search engines are making so much noise against Paid Links, Reciprocal Linking and so on, crying that all links should be done organically and webmasters should not try to boost their rankings artificially. This really made me wonder how many “organic” links you can get without bothering to do any “artificial” boosts.

It is a fact that 95% of all Internet users don’t have a single clue of HTML and if they don’t use any CMS to blog or manage their content they won’t be able to put the original <a href="http://www.seonewsblog.com">SEO News</a> html code and most of them will simply write www.seonewsblog.com or just seonewsblog.com . We don’t even have to mention the fact that if that link has also TITLE element, then its most probably (99.99%) made by a friend webmaster or in some sort of “artificial” campaign. This leads to the question if Search Engines are smart enough to realize and count the plain text links with greater value than html links since they seem quite more organic.

I’digged up some data from Yahoo site explorer and Google’s Webmasters Tools and I sow that there is no text mentioned link that is counted, but I’m not really sure if this is not a way to hide the true value of those links. That made me do one very simple experiment and check out what happens.

I made a brand new website (only few pages) and put a plain text link (no html) on one of my large websites so that it will be indexed quickly. I also didn’t tell anybody about this experiment so that nobody will link to me and get that website indexed.

After few days I’ve noticed that the website was visited by Google and Yahoo and that made me pretty sure that those spiders knew that I existed somehow and most probably that was by mentioning my website in plain text. This led me to the idea that those links are indeed with some value to Search Engines, but I’m still not sure exactly how much.

Now the thing that I’m experimenting on is to put numerous text links on different pages, blogs and comments to see if this is going to boost my website’s ranking in some relatively competitive area.

The problem that I got is that I’m not sure how search engines will treat my links as there are no keywords attached and if they show some value they must be able to “sense” the topic of that particular page that is linking to me. Indeed search engines are capable of doing this and knowing what’s what since they are “smart enough” to discount non-relevant links, and therefore if you know what’s non relevant then it is fairly simple to get the idea what’s relevant on that topic.

Now I’m looking for volunteers to help me spread the word by placing some text links to my website www.venetsian.com in SEO related pages. I’m targeting seo related keywords like seo services, seo expert, website seo, seo developer and etc, so if you want to help out just place my website url. PLEASE DO NOT USE HTML! Just regular text is fine!

If you wish to participate, please send me email to venetsian at venetsian.com and I’ll give you some links in return from other websites that I own.

Cheers and thank you.
Venetsian.

Related Posts:
The Best link-bait ever!
Google Now Shows Link Anchor Text Phrases
Cloak Your Affiliate Links Tutorial -NEW!
ImWebGuru.COM - SEO and Website Development Advices
Gmail Cracks Google’s Reliability

The New Directory Era

This weekend Google finally updated the backlink count in their Webmaster’s Center (this section was not updated for more than two months). Plenty of new links showed up from our massive link building campaigns, but something really interesting popped out – Low Quality web directory links, spammy looking links and site-wide links on irrelevant websites do not count any more as backlinks and were not longer listed there. I also checked with Yahoo Site explorer and found out that the situation with Yahoo is almost the same.

The last few months search engines took serious measures against Search Engine Spam and one of the most important changes in their algorithms was to find and neglect/discount any spammish looking links. The amazing thing is that most web directories that accept all sorts of links got labeled “not trustworthy” and their listings are no longer counted as backlinks. This was somehow expected in the webmaster world because there is no way to link to junk sites and not being labeled junk site.

This event really struck most of my websites due to the mere fact that my base strategy when releasing new website was to get 1,000 directory submissions for each of them and therefore give them the initial boost both in backlink count and also

pagerank. Now, with those changes in mind, this strategy is not that profitable and requires some drastic changes.

Here I’d like to say that search engine spiders still follow those links, because the spider activity on those sites did not decrease and we can see few hundred visits daily from googlebot on a website with only few pages which is actually a good thing and helps new content get indexed faster, so it’s not a total waste of money to do directory submissions.

Which Directories are now valuable with those changes?

Few months back I was never ever going to say such thing, but yes Paid Directories are the New Directory Era. That is mainly due to few very important characteristics that make them extremely valuable and somehow trustworthy:

  • Paid directories usually contain only few links, and those links are with some relatively good quality. Most webmasters pay for link only if they have some good content site and know that they will profit out of their website, therefore their quality is quite better than regular MFA’s and other crappy websites.
  • Most of the Paid Directories make their own review text that is placed on the listing page and this Unique content helps directories actually rank and therefore pass greater value to your links.
  • In fairly large percentage, paid directories invest a lot of money in building backlinks for their onw directory and therefore gain better trust rank for themselves. This actually passes quite a lot PR to your listings compared to even high quality free directories. Yes high quality free directories will still keep their good trust ranks and will still have value as backlinks, but we all know that getting a DMOZ listing is a one in a million chance.

So which paid directory I should submit in?

Choosing the best paid directory to submit your listings is not that hard thing to do, but yes it also requires few additional steps then just add the links. Basically the most important characteristics that form their quality are the following:

  • Base (homepage) Page Rank – must be better or pr 5
  • Number of incoming backlinks – visit yahoo.com and type site:www.domain.com and then click on inlinks. That will give you fairly accurate number of links pointing to that directory. Any number larger than 100,000 is good and should be considered as reliable directory. Make sure you are looking at the INLINKS not the site pages, because site pages are different story and not that valuable.
  • Number of Outgoing links aka listings – try to browse few categories and if you don’t see tons of listings in the most popular ones and only a few in the smaller categories then the directory is good. If they have a lot of listings this might mean that they might be linking to bad sites and that won’t do you any good, so good neighborhood is what really matters here.

I have one very simple formula for estimating the value of one directory if I want to pay for it – just divide the number of links to the number of pages that they have (from site:www.domain.com command). The number that you end up with is what I call Link Juice Value and the higher it is the better.

Any suggested good directories?

Yep, I’ll build you a list very soon (check this post for updates), but the first one that comes to my mind is www.avivadirectory.com – a really nice directory that charges quite a lot ($49.95) but it’s worth the money since aviva has more than half a million backlinks and only few hundred links. The list is sorted by Link Juice starting from the highest to lowest:

Related Posts:
Web Directories
SEO Services
Aviva Directory offers 15 days promo coupon $20 off regular listings
DMOZ Dead?
Manual Directory Submission Services

SEO proves that Google is using extensive User Behavioral Data as Website Ranking Criteria

Google Tracks User Behavior as low priority Website Ranking Criteria

I’ve been trying to convince webmasters for so long that Google is very smart and they are tracking user activity on the search index and also on your web pages, but in most cases people laughed at me and said that’s stupid. Guess what, finally a SEO did close monitored experiment and proved that this is true!

First lets start a bit with some background information that I guess some of you already know (whoever reads my blogs and rants on SEO). I’ve posted numerous articles and threads on different forums asking people what they think about Google’s Search Results and especially on the “onClick” javascript that monitors what Users are clicking on the search results page. In most cases people laughed at me saying that if Google is tracking this activity then a lot of people will be able to alter the Search Results and push-up or pull-down websites intentionally. Finally I got the proof on this!

The second thing that really bothered quite a lot, and also being widely discussed on different forums, is the fact that suddenly few years ago Google started offering Free Urchin Analytics Accounts which previously were paid around $300-$400 per year per website! As a businessman I really got amazed how Google suddenly became so generous and offered those really pricy services for free, and I started suspecting that they are doing some serious data mining with all that information collected. Guess what, I proved to be right, Google indeed monitors analytics accounts and website performance and its even adjusting website rankings based on that data!

The third thing that I was slapping in everybody’s faces was my readings from the latest Google Patent Application where I even labeled “VERY IMPORTANT :: USER BEHAVIOUR” in my analysis. Read the whole Google Patent text here.

Now let’s say what the proof is and what was done exactly.

Randy from 1st Rankings, just released the official data on his experiments on Google and User Behaviour Data in Rankings. He conducted two very interesting experiments which clearly show what I was trying to explain to all of you so many times.

Experiment 1 – tracking user activity without Google Analytics

Randy set up two closely monitored websites and asked 100 volunteers to search in Google for some pre-defined keywords and click on the website, then stay in the website for some time and then close the browser without returning in Google. This scenario is supposed to show Google that the User is looking for quality website in those specific keywords and the choice they did (clicking on that website) was that this website is what they were looking for. The situation is that when use clicks on a website from the search results, and then stays for some period, this period can determine how relevant this website was to the specific query keywords. If the period is short and the User returns and clicks other website, this most probably means that he/she did not found what they were looking for and the keep on looking until they find it. On the other hand, if they find a website and spend a lot of time there and even exit the site (not returning back to Google) then this most probably signals that they have found what they were looking for, and in such case, Google can award this website by increasing its ranking. This is often done when the top results are irrelevant to the query and Google automatically corrects its rankings based on the user’s judgment.

He set up two websites, one in non-popular niche and asked those 100 volunteers to click and the website, stay there for few minutes and close the browser. This signals Google that the quality is high and this website is awarded with more attention. His experiment showed that in about week, this website started moving up from position 10 to number 2.

Also he tested his theory in more competitive niche, using the same strategy, but it proved to be quite useless because the changing factor was negligible.

Experiment 2 – Tracking websites using Google Analytics

This experiment was very similar technique to the previous one, but this time he has all the websites participating being monitored by Google Analytics. Also in this scenario, he asked the volunteers to act like they are reading the website and browse throughout the website for some period.

The results proved to be astonishing. In about week and a half, the website popped up from position 80 to about 33 and maybe even more if they continued the experiment (the time frame for the experiment was exactly two weeks). This clearly shows that Google is indeed using the data collected from Google Analytics and adjusts its ranking accordingly to the User Behavior. When users find what they are looking for, the bounce rate decreases, and the time spent on the website increases. This is extremely valuable information to Google, as it’s the primary website quality characteristic.

What do we learn from that

  • Yes, Google is monitoring User Behavior and that can adjust your rankings. The user behavior importance for ranking is very low, but still it is considered.
  • Google monitors clicks on the Search Results page, and therefore Website Ranking Checking Software can hurt your rankings or at least won’t help.
  • Google does monitor your Analytics account and if you have high bounce rate (mostly for MFA and irrelevant websites) you might get punished and loose some ranking positions. If your bounce rate is higher than 75% you should remove Analytics from that website or try to troubleshoot it and lower that rate.
  • More content like articles and news on your website can help you increase the time spent and this can help you rank better for both SEO and Google user behavior tracking purposes.
  • Now its really debatable if you should even use Analytics, but I believe it’s a fair price to pay for monitoring your websites so if you have good content, you should not worry about that.
  • The recent acquisition of FeedBurner from Google might lead to another data mining situation when Google might start looking at your readers, but I guess that will be used in future upgrades on their algorithms.

Google can and maybe already is looking at your website quality using these monitoring techniques to price your AdSense ads and that might hurt a bit Advertising Publishers and MFA’s. We already felt last week’s changes in PPC prices based on web quality both from the Yahoo Publisher Network and Google AdSense. I’ll write on that a bit later when I gather more info.

Feel free to leave your comments on this post.

Related Posts:
Google goes after MFA sites with AdSense Arbitrage
Monday Morning SEO News Roundup Mar 19
The new Google Patent and the new quality guidelines
In search for the Perfect Organic Link
Google Aknowledges that they can’t fight GoogleBombing

Google is Going Down and MSN/LIVE dominates?

Lately, I’ve been obsessed with monitoring my traffic and I found some very interesting things that I didn’t know and I thought it would be a great idea to post my findings here. In order to be able to explain correctly, please take a look on the graphic below:
The top Search Engines and their overall Visitor Reach stats provided by Alexa

As you can see on the graphics, I’ve plotted the daily reach of Google, Yahoo, MSN and Live for the past five years. You can also see that I’ve specified for both yahoo, msn and live only for the search engine part because if we monitor the overall performance of Yahoo and MSN as they are not only search engines but also Web Portals, they will show quite higher stats.

From the last five years reach statistics you can clearly see the ups and downs on both Google, Yahoo and MSN. A quite significant (at least for me) event is the fact that Google from 2001 to 2006 was increasing in popularity, then stabilized for about an year, and now in 2007 its popularity is decreasing. On the other hand, Microsoft Corporation went a bit down in 2006 (due to the Google up-rise) and then in 2007 got back up quite a lot. The interesting thing here is that Microsoft Corp has both MSN and Live Search Engines and therefore their combined traffic (aka both search engines work under the same scoring/ranking algorithms and they should be considered to be the same thing) is quite more than Google and Yahoo and that’s really big thing here. If we assume that the Alexa Reach Stats are correct, then we can clearly see that Microsoft’s Search is 1.5 times bigger in volume/reach than Googles and that’s really sad news for Google.

The large spike in Search Volume for MSN/LIVE is mainly due to the heavy advertising Live.com had recently on virtually all medias. We see it on the radio, television and gigantic billboards all over the city. Also a big impact is the fact that Microsoft has built in Live Search in all Windows computers as a standard feature and we all know that about 99% of all internet users are using Windows and about 50% of those don’t really care which search engine they are using and therefore Microsoft is a good solution for their needs.

On the other hand I’ve been experiencing some very strange phenomena on my websites as I receive about 95% of my Search Engine Traffic from Google. This kind’a contradicts to the large search volume that Alexa Shows on MSN/LIVE and Yahoo and that’s a bit weird. Also the strange thing is that most of my websites rank pretty well on Google and Yahoo and therefore if the search volume is the same I should be expecting the same traffic from Yahoo as I get from Google right?

I’m really curious if someone else (like you) had noticed such funny events, because if so then we should drastically change our SEO strategies and stop kissing Google’s ass and start optimizing for MSN as we can clearly see the obvious Search Up-rise that they have. Our duty as SEO’s is to go for the search and if Google goes down then .. well who cares …

Please post your comments on this because I’m really curious to read your opinions.

UPDATE:
I was just informed that Alexa is not providing stats for Subdomains only for the primary domain and therefore we have some irrelevant information in those statistics plotted above. The issue is that Yahoo is a portal and therefore is receiving tons of traffic for the Email, News and other services offered there and the Search Portion is not really predictable. The same situation is with MSN.com as its also a big portal, and Live.com hosts the MSN Spaces for Blogger accounts. Also we can note that Google is offering tons of other services and that the data provided is not only for the Search Traffic.

When we further analyze the situation we can see that Live.COM is growing big and when we combine the traffic from the estimated number of searches from MSN and LIVE we ca assume (same as above) that the Microsoft Search is still very large portion of the total search engine traffic on the Internet and might have very close amount of search traffic as Google.

Nevertheless there is no clear proof that those statistics are correct and therefore are my own assumption based on my analysis on the Alexa statistics and might be not correct or even misleading. If I have better supported statistics that can be proved, we can determine the situation with better precision, but until then that’s what we’ve got.

Related Posts:
Utube Trying to Capitalize on Youtube Traffic!
Google goes after MFA sites with AdSense Arbitrage
eBay just bought StumbleUpon.com
Five Little Known Ways To SEO For Valentine’s Day Traffic
Google Blog Search Kicking Technorati Out The Door